Earlier this afternoon, in an internet chat group which I founded, someone criticized something based on the source of the something. To him I replied, "Even Hitler did one or two good things, [REDACTED NAME]."
After some preliminary reactions, I continued (the following has been expanded for this blog post, but most of these points were covered in my discussion):
Nobody here denies that he was a horrible, horrible person, and did all manner of wrong. What I'm saying is that the source of the request shouldn't matter, if what they call for is a good thing. Kinda like how when the Democrats do something the Republicans would have liked if a Republican had done it, if it's good, it's good, regardless of who did it.
Remember all the hell they gave Clinton over Bosnia? But if Reagan or Bush the Elder or Bush the Lesser had been CiC at the time and got American troops involved, it would have been another great example of Murkans wavin' our dicks in ever'one's faces, because MURKA!
And look, they elected Mitt Romney to be their candidate for President last go around, and he's the guy who did Obamacare before it was 'Obamacare.' And even though popular opinion is against them on the question of the Affordable Care Act, they continue making the untenable claim that 'most Americans' are opposed to it, and they continue to waste time trying to overturn it.
And that's not all! If you order now, you also get the dying gasps of inequality, in which they claim that they would use the military to prevent women from exercising freedom of choice guaranteed by the Supreme Court, call for laws to enable citizens to shoot anyone they merely suspect of being Gay, and gerrymander voting districts in an effort to disenfranchise minority voters, while praising the fascist bully boys for shooting yet another unarmed kid who happened to be non-Caucasian.
And they'll also throw in a bonus of astoundingly anti-American theocratic rhetoric and posturing, in which they argue that they have a "right" to decide what individuals in their communities can and cannot do (in spite of the evidence that so-called "dry counties" do not prevent residents from purchasing alcohol elsewhere, and in spite of the evidence that the same situation actually promotes driving while intoxicated), attempt to legalize discrimination under the guise of "religious freedom," advocate (in direct violation of Jesus' teachings in Matthew VI, 1-6) for public-led prayer in public schools, and pretend that science is a lie from the devil, so that they can justify allowing the petroleum industry to continue destroying our lives, prohibit the teaching of evolution in public schools, and continue to ignore the evidence which says, 'Yes, Virginia, Homosexuality and Transsexuality are no more matters of choice or alternative lifestyles than Intersex conditions are.'
And the list goes on, and on, and on. I'm not sure if they actually believe the lies, irrational horseshit, and blatant insanity they're spouting or are merely engaging in showmanship in an effort to win more support from the ignorant and prejudiced, but that ship has sailed.
But they're still fighting FDR over Medicare/Medicaid and Social Security, 80+ years later, all because FDR was a Democrat who did the things that their sorry asses would not do because they were too busy pimping the citizens out to the corporatists.
'AMG, Soshulizm!' Yeah, so? It saved your beloved Capitalism from dying the death it so richly deserved, after it attempted suicide in the 20s with all the voodoo economics, anti-labor policies, tax breaks for corporations, encouragement of bubble economies, opposition to any help for the workers, and so on. The same shit, by the way, which the Republicans have been trying again ever since Reagan. Verily, Santayana was right.
More to the point, the so-called 'socialism' which FDR brought to the table was the right thing to do for the people, whether he were Democrat or Republican.
But even causes which the Republicans embraced in the past have now been abandoned by the Republican Party, because Democrats got on board. Teddy Roosevelt and Ike Eisenhower believed in protecting the environment. Ike Eisenhower opposed racial inequality. For Mike Huckabee to speak of using the military to prevent abortion is an insult to heroes of the nation like Ike. I like Ike. (Hell, I'm even somewhat fond of Barry Goldwater, Dick Nixon, and Gerry Ford.) I loathe the Right Wingnuts, Would-be Theocrats, and Social Reactionaries, just as I loathe ignorance, prejudice, superstition, and irrationality.